You are currently viewing Medicine and Society: A Comparative Analysis of Dreamland and On Immunity

Medicine and Society: A Comparative Analysis of Dreamland and On Immunity

In the dynamic realm of literature, certain books emerge as profound sociocultural commentaries, capturing the essence of their respective time periods and shedding light on the most pressing issues of our society. Two such exemplary works are “Dreamland” by Sam Quinones and “On Immunity” by Eula Biss. While seemingly disparate in subject matter, these nonfiction narratives intricately explore the intricate fabric of our world, stimulating critical thought and provoking dialogue. “Dreamland” delves into the gripping narrative of America’s opioid crisis, revealing the interplay of economics, cultural shifts, and addiction. On the other hand, “On Immunity” traverses the realm of public health and vaccination controversies, offering a multi-faceted exploration of our collective anxieties, doubts, and perceptions surrounding immunization. These captivating works, though distinct in their foci, both serve as significant testimonies to the intricacies of our society, inviting readers to contemplate the fragile nature of human existence and the societal systems that shape our lives. Through a comparative study of “Dreamland” and “On Immunity,” this analysis aims to illuminate the shared themes, nuanced approaches, and evocative storytelling techniques employed by the authors, while also uncovering the broader social implications of their narratives. By drawing parallels between these seemingly disparate worlds, we aim to uncover the underlying connections and truths that lie beneath the surface, opening the door to a deeper understanding of the issues that shape our society.

Brief Summary of Two Books

Dreamland by Sam Quinones

Dreamland by Sam Quinones is a non-fiction book that explores the complex and interconnected factors behind America’s opioid epidemic. The book delves into the history and origins of the crisis, tracing its roots back to a small Mexican town called Xalisco.

Quinones highlights how a unique business model known as the “Xalisco Boys” became a major player in the drug trade. These young entrepreneurs reintroduced black tar heroin into the United States market, offering a highly accessible and inexpensive alternative to prescription painkillers. Their discreet and efficient delivery system, involving pager numbers and home deliveries, proved remarkably effective, attracting numerous addicts across the country.

The author also investigates the role of the pharmaceutical industry, specifically prescription opioid painkillers, in fueling the crisis. Doctors and pharmaceutical companies aggressively marketed these drugs, downplaying their addictive potential while overprescribing them. Many individuals became addicted to these medications and later turned to heroin when their prescriptions were cut off or became too expensive.

“Dreamland” also sheds light on the impact of widespread addiction and the devastation it has caused in communities across America. Quinones explores personal stories of addicts, their families, law enforcement officials, and healthcare professionals, giving readers a comprehensive understanding of the crisis. The book emphasizes the need for a multifaceted approach to address addiction, including education, treatment, and prevention.

Overall, “Dreamland” offers a comprehensive and eye-opening account of the opioid epidemic, uncovering the various threads that have contributed to its widespread nature, challenging preconceived notions, and creating awareness about the need for action.

On Immunity by Eula Biss

On Immunity” by Eula Biss is a non-fiction book that explores the complex world of vaccination and the cultural, historical, and scientific factors that shape our perceptions and decisions regarding immunization. Biss delves into her personal experiences as a new mother, her research on vaccines, and her conversations with doctors, scientists, and other parents to examine the fears, myths, and misunderstandings surrounding vaccination.

The book traces the origins of vaccine hesitancy, particularly in the anti-vaccine movement, and analyzes the interconnectedness between public health, individual choice, and social responsibility. Biss highlights how vaccines have been subject to controversy, conspiracy theories, and misinformation over the years, leading to a decline in vaccination rates in certain communities. She addresses concerns around vaccine safety, herd immunity, and the balance between individual rights and collective well-being.

Throughout the book, Biss also draws parallels between vaccination and other cultural practices, such as urban planning, pollution, and breastfeeding, showcasing how our notions of purity, contamination, and bodily integrity shape our attitudes towards immunization. She explores the historical context of vaccination, including references to early pioneers like Edward Jenner, and argues that vaccines are not only a matter of medical science but also of our cultural values and social responsibility.

“On Immunity” ultimately encourages readers to critically examine the narratives surrounding vaccines, question the sources of information they rely on, and engage in nuanced discussions about immunization. Biss emphasizes the importance of compassion, individual agency, and the collective responsibility we have towards one another when it comes to protecting public health.

Comparison between Two Books

Similarities in Medicine

Both Dreamland by Sam Quinones and On Immunity by Eula Biss touch upon the theme of medicine and its impact on society. Although they explore different aspects of medicine, there are several similarities between the two books.

1. Societal consequences: Both books emphasize the broader societal consequences of medicine. Quinones focuses on the opioid crisis in Dreamland and its effects on individuals, families, and entire communities. Biss, on the other hand, discusses the impact of vaccinations on society in On Immunity. Both authors shed light on how medicine can have far-reaching implications that extend beyond the individual level.

2. Historical context: Both books provide historical context to understand the current state of medicine. Quinones delves into the historical factors that contributed to the rise of the opioid epidemic, including the marketing strategies of pharmaceutical companies and the changes in medical practice. Similarly, Biss explores the history of vaccines, including their development and the cultural attitudes towards them. Both authors connect contemporary medical issues to their historical roots to provide a comprehensive understanding.

3. Public perception and skepticism: Both authors acknowledge the existence of public skepticism or issues surrounding their respective medical topics. In Dreamland, Quinones reflects on the initial perception of opioids as a powerful but non-addictive pain management tool, leading to widespread over-prescription. In On Immunity, Biss addresses the fears and doubts surrounding vaccinations, exploring the reasons behind vaccine hesitancy and the conspiracy theories that circulate. Both authors confront these challenges head-on, presenting different perspectives and encouraging critical thinking.

4. Personal narratives: Both books incorporate personal narratives to humanize the medical topics they tackle. Quinones introduces readers to individuals impacted by the opioid crisis, including addicts, dealers, and their families. By sharing their stories, he portrays the devastating consequences of this epidemic on a personal level. Biss, on the other hand, offers personal anecdotes about her own journey as a mother navigating the decision to vaccinate her child. These personal stories provide a relatable and emotional dimension to the medical themes in both books.

In summary, Dreamland by Sam Quinones and On Immunity by Eula Biss share similarities in their exploration of medicine. Both books discuss the societal effects of medical issues, provide historical context, address public skepticism, and weave personal narratives into their narratives.

Divergences in Medicine

Dreamland by Sam Quinones and On Immunity by Eula Biss are both books that delve into different aspects of medicine, but they approach the subject matter from quite distinct angles. While Dreamland focuses on the opioid crisis in America and its devastating effects on communities, On Immunity explores the history, science, and cultural implications of vaccination. The divergence in their exploration of medicine lies in the specific issues they address and the perspectives they offer.

In Dreamland, Sam Quinones shines a light on the opioid epidemic that has plagued the United States. He investigates the factors that led to the widespread abuse of prescription painkillers and the subsequent rise in heroin addiction. Quinones delves into the interconnectedness of pharmaceutical companies, pill mills, black tar heroin dealers, and the vulnerable communities that became trapped in a cycle of addiction and despair. The book provides a comprehensive account of the human tragedy caused by the overprescribing of opioids and the subsequent influx of cheap drugs.

On the other hand, Eula Biss takes a broader approach in On Immunity by examining the cultural and historical perspectives surrounding vaccination. Biss explores the fears and misconceptions that have led to vaccine hesitancy and the resurgence of once-controlled diseases. She delves into the origins of vaccination, the development of public health, and the ethical implications of collective immunity. Biss incorporates personal anecdotes, scientific research, and literary references to build a nuanced argument in favor of vaccination while acknowledging the complex emotions and legitimate concerns of those who oppose it.

While both books touch on issues related to medicine, Dreamland predominantly focuses on the consequences of widespread addiction and the failings of the healthcare system, while On Immunity delves into the complexity of vaccination and its societal implications. Dreamland examines the devastating human toll of the opioid crisis and the role of pharmaceutical companies in fueling the epidemic. In contrast, On Immunity navigates the historical, cultural, and scientific dimensions of vaccination while addressing concerns over individual choice, herd immunity, and public health.

In summary, the divergence between Dreamland by Sam Quinones and On Immunity by Eula Biss lies in their respective exploration of medicine. While Dreamland extensively investigates the opioid crisis and its impact on communities, On Immunity offers a broader examination of vaccination, encompassing historical, cultural, and scientific perspectives. Both books provide valuable insights into the complex issues surrounding medicine in society, but they approach the subject matter through different lenses.


Both “Dreamland” by Sam Quinones and “On Immunity” by Eula Biss are highly acclaimed books with valuable insights, but their subject matters and styles differ significantly. The choice ultimately depends on your personal interests and what you seek in a book.

“Dreamland” explores the opioid crisis in America, particularly the rise of heroin addiction in small-town America and how it connects to the pharmaceutical industry’s aggressive marketing of painkillers. It delves into the history and social dynamics behind this crisis, presenting a comprehensive and compelling narrative. If you are interested in social issues, drugs, healthcare, or investigative journalism, “Dreamland” is worth reading.

“On Immunity,” on the other hand, is a philosophical exploration of vaccination, immunity, and our society’s attitudes towards them. Eula Biss delves into the history and cultural factors surrounding vaccination, addressing common concerns, fears, and misconceptions. It delves into themes of parenthood, community, and the nature of our responsibilities to one another. If you are interested in healthcare ethics, motherhood, or want to ponder societal values and beliefs, “On Immunity” is worth reading.

In summary, both books offer unique and valuable perspectives, but it is essential to choose based on your interests and concerns.

Leave a Reply