Blog

In the vast realm of literature, certain works stand out as truly remarkable, capturing the essence of human existence and exploring profound themes in ways that transcend time, culture, and language. Among these exceptional creations are Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s “Frankenstein” and Juan Rulfo’s “Pedro Páramo.” Despite their origins in different periods and cultures, these two novels share striking similarities in their exploration of themes such as identity, the nature of humanity, and the blurred boundaries between life and death.

Published in 1818, “Frankenstein” immediately captivated readers with its gripping narrative and thought-provoking ideas. Shelley’s tale revolves around Victor Frankenstein, a brilliant scientist who defies the laws of nature by creating a grotesque monster. Through this gothic masterpiece, Shelley delves into the questions surrounding the origins of life and the consequences of playing God, while examining the fragile nature of human identity and the perils of unchecked ambition.

Similarly, “Pedro Páramo,” published in 1955 by Mexican author Juan Rulfo, delves into themes of existence and humanity but takes a different approach. Set in the fictionalized town of Comala, Rulfo’s novel presents a fragmented narrative that blurs the line between the living and the dead. The story follows Juan Preciado’s journey to seek out his father, Pedro Páramo, only to find himself entangled in a web of surreal encounters and ghostly apparitions. Through its nonlinear narrative structure and poetic language, Rulfo explores the repercussions of human actions and the haunting legacy of a man consumed by power.

While Shelley’s “Frankenstein” and Rulfo’s “Pedro Páramo” were written in different historical, cultural, and linguistic contexts, their thematic resonance is striking. Both novels challenge the traditional notions of identity, life, and death, forcing readers to confront the existential questions that lie at the core of human existence. By comparing and contrasting these two literary masterpieces, we can gain a deeper understanding of how these themes are examined through diverse perspectives, shedding light on the universal and timeless nature of such inquiries.

Through this comparative study, we will delve into the similarities and differences in the treatment of identity, the exploration of the human condition, and the portrayal of the boundaries between life and death in Shelley’s “Frankenstein” and Rulfo’s “Pedro Páramo.” By examining the thematic threads that weave through these narratives, we will uncover the ways in which they converge and diverge, highlighting the brilliance of these two authors and the enduring significance of their works. As we embark on this exploration, we invite you to join us in this scholarly journey through the depths of these literary creations to discover the profound truths they unveil.

“Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley is a Gothic novel that explores themes of science, ambition, humanity, and the consequences of playing god. The story is set in the late 18th century and is narrated by multiple characters.

The novel follows Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist who becomes obsessed with the idea of creating life. He succeeds in bringing a creature to life, but instead of feeling joy, he is horrified by his creation’s grotesque appearance and abandons it. The creature, left to fend for itself, develops a thirst for revenge upon his creator and begins a relentless pursuit of Frankenstein.

As the story unfolds, the reader sympathizes with both Frankenstein and his creature. Frankenstein experiences guilt and remorse for creating something so monstrous, while the creature grapples with his own identity and seeks acceptance from society. The novel delves into the issues of responsibility, isolation, and the blurred lines between morality and science.

Victor’s pursuit of knowledge costs him dearly, as his creation unleashes a series of tragic events on him and his loved ones. The book raises questions about the ethics of scientific exploration, the nature of humanity, and the consequences of unchecked ambition.

Ultimately, “Frankenstein” is a cautionary tale that warns against the dangers of playing god and the importance of taking responsibility for our own creations. It presents a haunting exploration of the human condition, the power of nature over nurture, and the pervasive impacts of loneliness and rejection.

“Pedro Páramo” by Juan Rulfo is a Mexican novel that tells the story of Juan Preciado, a young man who ventures to the town of Comala in search of his father, Pedro Páramo. Upon arriving, Juan discovers a desolate and ghostly atmosphere, filled with the voices and stories of the deceased. As he delves deeper into his father’s past, Juan learns about Pedro Páramo’s rise to power, his tyrannical rule over the town, and the devastating consequences of his actions. Through a combination of storytelling, flashbacks, and Juan’s personal experiences, the novel explores themes of death, conscience, and the complex relationship between the living and the dead.

Both Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and Pedro Páramo by Juan Rulfo explore the theme of the supernatural in their respective narratives. Despite being different in terms of genre and setting, both works incorporate elements of the supernatural to highlight the character’s internal struggles and the consequences of their actions.

1. Creation and the Supernatural: In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein successfully creates life through the supernatural act of reanimating dead bodies, resulting in the birth of his monster. Similarly, in Pedro Páramo, the character of Miguel Páramo, Pedro’s illegitimate son, is believed to have supernatural powers that allow him to communicate with the dead. Both creations, the monster and Miguel, exist as otherworldly beings, embodying supernatural qualities that challenge the boundary between life and death.

2. Consequences of Playing God: In both works, the characters’ pursuit of supernatural power and knowledge leads to disastrous consequences. Victor Frankenstein’s obsession with unlocking the secrets of life ultimately results in the destruction of his loved ones and his own downfall. Similarly, Pedro Páramo’s relentless pursuit of power and control over his village leads to its desolation and his own damnation. The supernatural elements in both narratives serve as warnings about the dangers of seeking power beyond the natural order, illustrating the disastrous outcomes of such actions.

3. Haunting and Ghostly Presence: Both works incorporate a haunting atmosphere as the characters grapple with supernatural encounters. In Frankenstein, the monster stalks Victor Frankenstein, tormenting him with his presence and seeking revenge for his creation. Similarly, in Pedro Páramo, the deceased inhabitants of the village haunt the living, symbolizing the unresolved conflicts and sins of the past. These supernatural apparitions emphasize the characters’ guilt and the haunting of their conscience, serving as reminders of the consequences of their actions.

4. Moral Ambiguity: The supernatural elements in both works contribute to a sense of moral ambiguity. Frankenstein’s monster, despite his terrifying appearance, possesses a sensitive and intelligent nature, challenging the readers’ preconceived notions of good and evil. Likewise, in Pedro Páramo, the encounters with the dead reveal the complex nature of morality, blurring the lines between the living and the dead. The supernatural elements in both narratives serve as a catalyst to question traditional moral frameworks and explore the complexity of human nature.

In conclusion, both Frankenstein and Pedro Páramo use the supernatural to explore themes of creation, moral ambiguity, and the consequences of human actions. Despite their distinct settings and genres, the presence of the supernatural in both works underscores the characters’ internal struggles and heightens the moral dilemmas they face.

Both Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley and Pedro Paramo by Juan Rulfo touch upon supernatural elements, but they do so in distinct ways, highlighting their divergence.

In Frankenstein, the supernatural is centered around Victor Frankenstein’s creation of life through science. Through his ambition and relentless pursuit of knowledge, Frankenstein manages to bring a creature to life, defying natural laws. The novel explores the consequences of playing god, delving into the darker aspects of scientific innovation. Shelley’s portrayal of the supernatural is grounded in the scientific realm, invoking themes of hubris and the repercussions of tampering with nature.

On the other hand, Pedro Paramo incorporates a more spiritual and mystical form of the supernatural. Rulfo’s novel is set in the ghost town of Comala, where the protagonist Juan Preciado encounters various spirits and haunted personalities. The supernatural in Pedro Paramo intertwines with Mexican folklore and superstitions, creating an eerie atmosphere where reality blends with the world of spirits. Rulfo’s portrayal of the supernatural emphasizes themes of death, guilt, and the weight of past actions.

The divergence between the two novels lies in their approach to the supernatural. Frankenstein ties it closely to science, reflecting the anxieties and ethical implications of scientific advancements. On the other hand, Pedro Paramo incorporates supernatural elements as a vehicle for exploring themes of memory, guilt, and the impact of the past on the present. The supernatural in Rulfo’s work serves as a metaphorical representation of the haunting past and the consequences of unresolved actions.

Despite these differences, both novels use the supernatural to delve into deeper philosophical questions and reveal the human condition. While Frankenstein incorporates elements of gothic horror, exploring the boundaries of human ambition, Pedro Paramo utilizes the supernatural to expose the consequences of past sins and create a haunting depiction of memory and redemption. These diverging approaches to the supernatural enrich the thematic exploration and provide unique perspectives on the human experience.

Determining which book is more worthy of reading is subjective, as it ultimately depends on personal preferences and interests. However, both “Frankenstein” by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley and “Pedro Paramo” by Juan Rulfo are considered highly influential and significant works of literature.

“Frankenstein” is often regarded as a classic of Gothic fiction and science fiction. It explores themes such as human ambition, the duality of human nature, and the consequences of playing god. Shelley’s novel raises thought-provoking questions about the nature of humanity, the ethics of scientific discovery, and the importance of empathy and compassion.

“Pedro Paramo,” on the other hand, is a renowned Mexican novel that blends elements of magical realism and existentialism. Rulfo’s work is considered a masterpiece of Latin American literature, presenting a fragmented narrative that blurs the lines between reality and the supernatural. It delves into themes such as identity, memory, and the ambiguity of truth.

Ultimately, both books have their own merits and offer unique literary experiences. It would be worthwhile to consider which themes, genres, or historical contexts you are more drawn to when making a decision.